National Enquirer.

Space/Science » in reply to Pure, unadulterated junk

National Enquirer.

Woodlock — 11/19/2003 3:38:43 PM (archived)

It is you're rudimentary understanding that there is a hidden force in the universe that prevent science from being published in the National Enquirer?
Or maybe it's your understanding that any science published in the National Enquirer is some how changed from being scientific information?

The whole thread (10 posts)

More Junk Science From BD & Gil Levin in Reply To Altacama Study - Mark Eby - 11/18/2003 1:08:37 PM
- Pure, unadulterated junk - Donald - 11/19/2003 5:30:11 AM
  - I think that comment was Levin's - Buster - 11/20/2003 1:52:58 AM
  - National Enquirer. - Woodlock - 11/19/2003 3:38:43 PM
    - Thanks for the lesson in how to nuke your credibility - Buster - 11/20/2003 1:50:48 AM
      - Ah yes.... - Donald - 11/20/2003 2:57:39 AM
- He hits it on the head. - Woodlock - 11/18/2003 4:18:17 PM
  - Is it BD or GL who you think enjoys beating his head? (n/t) - Buster - 11/19/2003 2:00:20 AM
  - hits what on the head? - Justin Kelly - 11/19/2003 12:06:53 AM
    - re: hits what on the head? - Woodlock - 11/19/2003 4:07:41 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (10 posts)