Hmmm. So anti-pork commentary is "SPAM" whereas comments flattering NASA are somehow "ideal"?

Space/Science » in reply to Ok, who exactly is this spamming fruitcake?

SpaceProjects.com — 1/7/2004 2:19:31 PM (archived)

Hmmm. So anti-pork commentary is considered "SPAM" by you and fellow NASA contractor clique sycophants, whereas comments flattering NASA are somehow ideal? Gee, I wonder why you might wish that we all played by those "selfless" rules...

The whole thread (15 posts)

Rover briefing scheduled for 9:00 Pacific time. - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2004 4:47:07 PM
- Thanks for the link - SteveS - 1/6/2004 6:09:58 PM
- re: Seeing Red. - Marcia - 1/6/2004 5:42:36 PM
  - Can You Find These - Mark Eby - 1/7/2004 2:13:05 AM
- New pictures! - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2004 5:31:32 PM
  - prevailing winds - Greg - 1/7/2004 3:54:22 PM
    - re: prevailing winds. - Marcia - 1/7/2004 7:40:54 PM
  - Of where...Afghanistan? ;-) - SpaceProjects.com - 1/6/2004 5:42:58 PM
    - Ok, who exactly is this spamming fruitcake? - R.L. - 1/6/2004 8:41:05 PM
      - Hmmm. So anti-pork commentary is "SPAM" whereas comments flattering NASA are somehow "ideal"? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/7/2004 2:19:31 PM
      - SpaceProjects.tk. Some info there.... (n/t) - et - 1/6/2004 8:44:38 PM
  - Now yer talkin'! - alcaray - 1/6/2004 5:37:25 PM
    - re: In conversation during the briefing.... - Marcia - 1/6/2004 5:47:48 PM
      - Wish they'd hurry up and get the rover's butt in gear. - Tom Brosz - 1/6/2004 6:19:08 PM
        
        re: ... they keep throwing candy to the geologists. LOL - Marcia - 1/6/2004 6:48:07 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)