From an interview with the Telegraph.

In an exclusive interview with The Telegraph, Dr Kay, who last week resigned as head of the Iraq Survey Group, said that he had uncovered evidence that unspecified materials had been moved to Syria shortly before last year's war to overthrow Saddam.

"We are not talking about a large stockpile of weapons," he said. "But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD programme. Precisely what went to Syria, and what has happened to it, is a major issue that needs to be resolved."

Or do we get to pick and choose when Kay is credible and when he isn't, depending on whether or not we like what we think he's saying?

I've noticed that Powell has also suddenly become an oracle of truth now that he's said something that can be interpreted as agreeing with the antiwar agenda.