Direct aerocapture at Mars may be too big a step, at least until some experience is gained. It might be better to briefly enter the atmosphere at a shallow angle to burn off some excess velocity then use rocket engines to get rid of the rest for orbital insertion. Every bit of velocity burned off in the atmosphere pays big dividends in reduced propellant needed to enter orbit.
I still think settling into orbit before landing is a good idea. It allows you to land only the portions of the vehicle needed for surface exploration, greatly reducing your landing and liftoff mass. This was the big advantage of Lunar Orbit Rendevous for the Apollo missions. It also allows you some flexibility in choosing your landing time. At least one of the earlier Mars probes (Mariner 10, if memory serves) arrived at the destination while a planetwide duststorm was raging. Attempting a manned landing under those conditions might be just too dangerous.
Space/Science » in reply to Aerocapture questions
re: Aerocapture questions
The whole thread (15 posts)
- Alternative Interplanetary Launch Method: Ramjet
- re: Alternative Interplanetary Launch Method: Ramjet
- A different (sc)ramjet aerospace craft design may help.
- re: Alternative Interplanetary Launch Method: Ramjet
- re: Alternative Interplanetary Launch Method: Ramjet
- The devil is in the details
