Space/Science » in reply to Lileks fires on Patrick Stewart

The whole thread (22 posts)

• Lileks fires on Patrick Stewart - Tom Brosz - 2/5/2004 6:35:11 AM
  • I,m sure while he was in star trek when interview he implied the opersite hmmm (n/t) - brian gyles - 2/7/2004 11:03:19 AM
  • re: Mirror Principle - SDAI-Tech1 - 2/7/2004 1:53:58 AM
  • Stewart might consider just how silly he sounds - ebnelson - 2/6/2004 1:47:34 PM
  • Perhaps he was in Star Trek too long - Buck Galaxy - 2/5/2004 7:15:44 PM
    • re: Perhaps he was in Star Trek too long - Marcia - 2/6/2004 10:47:22 PM
  • . . . and the question, as always, is: "Who cares?" - Fox - 2/5/2004 4:47:36 PM
    • I Think The Point - Mark Eby - 2/5/2004 6:53:52 PM
      • re: The Point - Fox - 2/6/2004 4:39:10 AM
        • re: The Point - Mark Eby - 2/6/2004 3:08:56 PM
    • I'm with you - alcaray - 2/5/2004 5:05:10 PM
      • re: I'm with you - McFly - 2/5/2004 6:33:50 PM
  • re: Lileks fires on Patrick Stewart - dlp_79 - 2/5/2004 4:08:52 PM
    • Wrong priorities - Gary - 2/5/2004 5:01:14 PM
      • re: Wrong priorities - phil - 2/5/2004 5:37:49 PM
        • re: SF - Raoul - 2/5/2004 8:32:23 PM
          • David Lindsay - Gary - 2/6/2004 4:11:41 AM
  • Deservedly so - McFly - 2/5/2004 3:37:38 PM
    • re: If people don't get along in space, they are more likely to die - Success_Machine - 2/5/2004 11:39:41 PM
      • elsewhere, too (n/t) - alcaray - 2/6/2004 12:08:05 AM
  • Smugly glad I always felt Star Trek & Trekkies sucked (n/t) - phil - 2/5/2004 1:54:25 PM
  • re: Hollywood has never applied their special effects to depict something as big as an ARMXER Orbital Skyhook - Success_Machine - 2/5/2004 9:54:06 AM