Another specious charge.

well, he certainly will make an argument, refuse to give a rebutal, and use that argument over again.

Which specific point(s) do you believe he refused to rebut in that thread?

Thats worse than being contradictory.

Perhaps I needed to be clearer. I meant I haven't seen Greg ignore facts that conclusively suggest his position(s) are wrong. From what I've seen, he's answered numerous counterpoints and explained intelligently why he didn't believe they were conclusive evidence of error in his position(s). If you can cite specific examples where you don't believe that's occurred (and it should be easy, given your original assertion), please do so.

Some of the conservatives here seem to believe Calhoun's statement's should be accepted as truth, while Burkett's shouldn't be. Why should one be believed (or disbelieved) and not the other?