Current Events » in reply to re: Tom, Larry and others will not get the point. They prefer to hand wave away the Bush Whitehouse "use" of science... Bush is amoral and so are those he choses to work with. They will do anything s…

The whole thread (15 posts)

• Union of Concerned Scientists Report Condemns Bush Administration,,, - Chris Vancil - 2/23/2004 9:37:33 PM
  • I guess they think that any scientist who disagrees with them must be "unconcerned" - Larry J - 2/25/2004 1:09:49 AM
    • re: Based on What? They are concerned what would you call yourself if you were? BTW lame rationalization of your views. Show us one scientist with an opposing views. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 2/25/2004 7:43:16 AM
  • re: Science twarted - Raoul - 2/24/2004 6:48:40 AM
    • The article makes it's point......... - Lindy - 2/24/2004 4:49:25 PM
  • Additional material - S - 2/24/2004 3:03:54 AM
    • re: Tom, Larry and others will not get the point. They prefer to hand wave away the Bush Whitehouse "use" of science... Bush is amoral and so are those he choses to work with. They will do anything s… (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 2/24/2004 9:00:09 PM
      • Sounds like you're projecting to me (n/t) - Larry J - 2/25/2004 1:07:09 AM
        • re: No pushing you into the dialog. Come on where is the League of Unconcerned Science when you need them. 8-) (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 2/25/2004 7:48:50 AM
          • Come on where is the League of Unconcerned Science when you need them. 8-) - gbaikie - 2/25/2004 8:44:03 PM
  • This Administration would have jailed Galileo. - Bowser - 2/23/2004 11:38:19 PM
    • re: Oh, no doubt at all . . . - D. Spires - 2/24/2004 12:35:29 AM
      • re: Oh, no doubt at all . . . - Tom Brosz - 2/24/2004 3:48:14 AM
        • re: Oh, no doubt at all . . . - Bowser - 2/24/2004 3:59:53 AM
      • Howdy, Dan. Nice to read you. (n/t) - Bowser - 2/24/2004 1:04:26 AM