Current Events » in reply to Jeepers. Where were you in 2000?

The whole thread (22 posts)

• Appeasing? - Bowser - 3/19/2004 2:48:57 PM
  • Compare and contrast - Fox - 3/19/2004 4:30:40 PM
  • re: Absolutely . . . - D. Spires - 3/19/2004 4:29:57 PM
    • Isn't it funny how conservatives are allowed to criticize the will of the people... - alcaray - 3/19/2004 5:12:03 PM
      • Have it your way. - Tom Brosz - 3/19/2004 5:58:38 PM
        • re: the UN and Spain - Raoul - 3/19/2004 11:38:06 PM
          • re: the UN and Spain - Tom Brosz - 3/20/2004 1:17:30 AM
            • re: But - Raoul - 3/20/2004 4:37:55 PM
        • Spanards are trying to have it their way... - McFly - 3/19/2004 9:19:04 PM
        • Events are supposed to sway votes. What else should? - alcaray - 3/19/2004 6:19:23 PM
          • I should bookmark that in case bin Laden is caught in October. ;) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/19/2004 6:23:45 PM
            • You won't catch me claiming otherwise (n/t) - alcaray - 3/19/2004 6:35:55 PM
      • re: Isn't it funny how conservatives are allowed to criticize the will of the people... - Bowser - 3/19/2004 5:33:29 PM
        • I see your point but... - RobVG - 3/19/2004 6:01:36 PM
          • The vote is the vote is the vote - alcaray - 3/19/2004 6:16:32 PM
            • Jeepers. Where were you in 2000? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/19/2004 6:19:56 PM
              • Trying to puzzle out who wasn't permitted to vote. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/19/2004 6:37:17 PM
          • Meant for alcaray. (n/t) - RobVG - 3/19/2004 6:02:59 PM
      • re: Isn't it funnier . . . - D. Spires - 3/19/2004 5:31:55 PM
        • I apologize if my use of the word "allowed" was confusing - alcaray - 3/19/2004 6:12:25 PM
          • re: I don't think the "vote", per se, should have gone anywhere . . . - D. Spires - 3/19/2004 6:33:34 PM
            • We agree completely, on what you said (n/t) - alcaray - 3/19/2004 6:39:07 PM