Bigger Nit

Space/Science » in reply to Is the Aerospace Industry Ready for Mars . . . ?

Bigger Nit

robert_d — 3/22/2004 2:32:43 AM (archived)

The diagram appears to show the LM with the label "lunar rover". Don't know who built the rover, but the LM itself was built by Grumman, now part of Northrup-Grumman, so that the premise embodied in the title of the diagram is arguably totally inaccurate.

The whole thread (14 posts)

Is the Aerospace Industry Ready for Mars . . . ? - D. Spires - 3/21/2004 8:22:03 PM
- re: Mars isn't the current destination. The Moon is. (n/t) - Success_Machine - 3/22/2004 11:29:05 PM
  - re: Well . . . - D. Spires - 3/23/2004 10:12:43 PM
    - re: But no date has been set for a manned Mars mission, but 2014-2020 has been set for the moon - Success_Machine - 3/24/2004 5:17:52 PM
- re: Is the Aerospace Industry Ready for Mars . . . ? - Marcia - 3/22/2004 6:17:06 PM
- Bigger Nit - robert_d - 3/22/2004 2:32:43 AM
  - re: Bigger Nit - Chris Vancil - 3/22/2004 5:35:08 AM
- Is NASA ready for anything at all? - Tom Brosz - 3/22/2004 1:53:49 AM
  - Isn't a Hubble flight risky because of no backup Shuttle? - Bowser - 3/22/2004 5:13:10 PM
    - re: Planning - Raoul - 3/22/2004 5:34:17 PM
      - re: Planning - McFly - 3/22/2004 6:58:44 PM
  - Wow, that never even occured to me... - McFly - 3/22/2004 4:05:10 PM
  - It's either them...the Chinese...or no one at all. (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 3/22/2004 2:16:29 PM
- sorry for being picky but - Delbert - 3/22/2004 12:07:06 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (14 posts)