in some indication of what your rational threshold is.

You have not given me, as yet, any reason to believe that you have one. The Bar seems to be raised as larger and larger things take place, such as:

1. No WMD
2. No Al-Qaeda Terrorists
3. No Nuke program
4. Paul O'Niel saying that even before the facts were known, Iraq was the main target post-911
5. Clarke sying essentially the same thing
6. Rumsfeld openly lying and being busted, here
7. The ENTIRE bulk of Powells presentation to the UN being truthless in the least.

Frankly, its like the the period after the war where I kept asking you "when will you believe Iraq had no WMD", and you kept saying "not yet! Not Yet!". You never answered, but rather changed the justification to the war with one breath and started defending the 'truth gap' with the next.

Or, its like the pre-war, during-war and after-war pewriod, where I was showering you with data that actively refuted the so-called 'Al Qaerda/911' Iraq-Saddam links. I kept asking you, at what point will you doubt that this stuff [that the whitehouse is generating] has any truth or value?

That you are ideologically 'pure' and 'hard core' I can respect- that you never draw a breath in criticism (outside lousy steel tarrifs) over what appears to be at least major screw-ups and incompetence or at most dishonesty and shoddy policy moves on the level of malpractice- thats why I am starting to not bother with your 'link a right-wing-blog-a-day' posts...

Davin L.