Current Events » in reply to What? There was no terror in Iraq before the war?

The whole thread (20 posts)

• Why is anyone still listening to Hans Blix? - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2004 4:17:00 AM
  • Hans Blix couldn't find his own ass with both hands. (n/t) - DFM - 4/8/2004 6:30:03 PM
  • Why is anyone still listening to George Bush? - Bowser - 4/8/2004 4:26:38 AM
    • Blix thinks Iraq was better off under Saddam. 'Nuff said. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2004 4:43:43 AM
      • And how do you think Bush is going to prevent a civil war? - Bowser - 4/8/2004 12:21:02 PM
      • re: Terrorism - Raoul - 4/8/2004 5:44:16 AM
        • Raoul's dDefinition of terrorisim: innocent people being murdered by someone other than Saddam. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2004 4:02:02 PM
          • Wow... Pretty shabby stuff tom. You gonna call him a Saddam Lover next? - Davin L. - 4/8/2004 9:38:53 PM
          • That is another foul mischaracterization. Deliberate. - Bowser - 4/8/2004 4:57:49 PM
            • What? There was no terror in Iraq before the war? - Tom Brosz - 4/8/2004 11:49:54 PM
              • .... There was no terror in Iraq before the war? - Publius - 4/9/2004 2:00:33 PM
                • You've got no rational response either, huh? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 4/9/2004 6:09:01 PM
              • re: Inside Iraq - Raoul - 4/9/2004 5:46:57 AM
        • Heh, heh. Bush said there WERE WMDs. Nuff sed? (n/t) - Bowser - 4/8/2004 12:22:45 PM
        • re: Terrorism - Buck Galaxy - 4/8/2004 7:13:45 AM
          • re: the future.... - Raoul - 4/8/2004 5:42:27 PM
            • re: the future.... - gbaikie - 4/9/2004 7:51:32 PM
          • Iraqi "independence". - Bowser - 4/8/2004 12:30:18 PM
        • re: Terrorism - gbaikie - 4/8/2004 6:07:33 AM
      • I agree with Blix - Lindy - 4/8/2004 5:37:25 AM