Tektittes

Space/Science » in reply to re: but California layered roccks lack tektittes

Tektittes

Nick Hoffman — 4/28/2004 4:23:32 PM (archived)

Too spherical for their size.

Wrong size distribution.

Not lkaid down in discrete layers.

To Fe-rich.

Too Haematite rich.

Too crystalline.

But otherwise possible... :-]

The whole thread (15 posts)

Layered rocks - Tom Brosz - 4/27/2004 3:07:18 AM
- but California layered roccks lack tektittes - E.P. Grondine - 4/27/2004 9:40:51 PM
  - re: but California layered roccks lack tektittes - REB - 4/28/2004 12:49:52 PM
    - Tektittes - Nick Hoffman - 4/28/2004 4:23:32 PM
      - spheircal - E.P. Grondine - 4/29/2004 10:04:07 PM
      - re: Tektites - REB - 4/28/2004 4:54:49 PM
        
        I lean to Biologic explanation, - Philip Simon - 4/28/2004 8:08:26 PM
        
        re: I lean to Biologic explanation, - REB - 4/28/2004 8:25:52 PM
        
        re: I lean to Biologic explanation, - Philip Simon - 4/28/2004 11:08:04 PM
        
        re: I lean to Biologic explanation, - Andrew bateman - 4/29/2004 5:13:43 PM
        
        re: I lean to Biologic explanation, - REB - 4/29/2004 12:35:59 PM
        
        Yes, - Phil Simon - 4/30/2004 3:09:19 AM
      - Maybe "Tektites" - Nick Hoffman - 4/28/2004 4:45:28 PM
  - I should clarify... - Tom Brosz - 4/28/2004 2:06:11 AM
- Cool!...Brings Mars down to earth so-to-speak. (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 4/27/2004 3:49:34 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (15 posts)