So, what would the "midcourse correction" be? Ideas? Oh, wait. Your side doesn't need to come up with ideas. It just needs to pee on shoes.

As for "final costs, exact dates," and all the rest, only an idiot would try and predict that. But then, catching Bush out on a prediction later this year that didn't pan out is the whole point, isn't it?

Basically, the article boils down to "Washington Post and Democratic leaders think Bush sucks." This is news?

I'll be glad when the election is over, one way or the other, and the Democratic Party and their media buttmonkeys can maybe start putting national security above getting Bush out of office.