Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to What is John Carmack trying to prove?

re: What is John Carmack trying to prove?

Just that he can achieve vehicular control. Simply blasting upwards is probably the easiest thing to do, but if you're wanting to survive the flight, there are a few other considerations. Now that they're doing powered landings, fine vehicular control is especially important. Hovering in place is probably the easiest part of that problem; controlling a descent is going to be a bit more difficult (as their boosted hop demonstrated).

Just from looking at their videos, none of their previous hovering techniques were really satisfactory. If you can't do a really stable hover, then you definitely won't be able to control a dynamic descent. However, that last hover test (before they wrecked the vehicle) just NAILED it -- It looked as stable as the DC-X or the Japanese RTV -- so I don't expect that they'll be messing around with hovering much longer. I think it's safe to now predict that with each new vehicle they build, they'll be able to quickly hover-test it (just to be sure), before moving on to higher and higher boosted hops. Their progress in the next couple of months should be rapid, regulation-permitting, and I look forward to watching it unfold every Sunday! While I think it's quite unlikely that they'll snatch the prize away from Burt, I think they've got a decent chance of going supersonic with a subscale vehicle before the end of the summer.

Cheers,

Nathan

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (7 posts)