re: It's just too darned bad

Space/Science » in reply to Limestone, not Sabkha Siltstone

BRFelix — 6/22/2004 3:06:34 AM (archived)

that there is no way to test for any of these hypotheses right now today.

If this is a "wet" deposit analogous to limestone, and the result of (ulp) biological activity of some sort, it would be nice to know it sooner rather than later.

The formation cries out for a completely open-minded analysis.

Cheers, BRFelix

The whole thread (11 posts)

Limestone, not Sabkha Siltstone - Philip Simon - 6/22/2004 1:09:21 AM
- re: Let's say it's not limestone - BRFelix - 6/25/2004 5:04:12 AM
- Check out this new Oppy picture - REB - 6/22/2004 12:58:22 PM
  - More here. - REB - 6/22/2004 1:01:33 PM
- re: Limestone, not Sabkha Siltstone - REB - 6/22/2004 11:37:17 AM
  - I agree, depositionally like limestone, not compositionally - Simon - 6/22/2004 4:54:41 PM
  - re: Limestone, not Sabkha Siltstone - RobVG - 6/22/2004 4:46:32 PM
    - not a bad theory ...but - Simon - 6/22/2004 10:46:39 PM
- re: It's just too darned bad - BRFelix - 6/22/2004 3:06:34 AM
- Flash - Martian Spherules have Hands! - Simon - 6/22/2004 1:56:35 AM
  - I forgot to mention The Labyrinth - Simon - 6/22/2004 2:05:10 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (11 posts)