re: Still no bark

Current Events » in reply to Still no bark (special pleading and other easily demolished arguments)

re: Still no bark

Tom Brosz — 7/3/2004 3:59:09 AM (archived)

Finally, and just for the record, I have never maintained that Bush planned 911, so kindly quit trying to put words in my mouth.

Then why do you keep connecting us over and over again to tinfoil heads who insist he did? Or maybe you missed Romero's last line:

Quod Erat Demonstradum, the Bush Administration was part of the 9-11 plot.

I submit that your constant harping on this particular subject is as annoying as being told endlessly by people like Hoagland that a particular rock in a rover photo is actually an ancient bagel toaster. You just have to LOOK hard enough.

The whole thread (13 posts)

The Dog That Did Not Arf - S - 7/2/2004 8:14:37 PM
- This is as stupid Lindy's flase claim that anyone in the Bush family was indicted for treason (n/t) - ebnelson - 7/3/2004 1:01:22 AM
  - Trading with the enemy - S - 7/3/2004 2:08:35 AM
- You know, you make avoiding ad hominems extraordinarily difficult... - Tom Brosz - 7/2/2004 9:11:38 PM
  - Still no bark (special pleading and other easily demolished arguments) - S - 7/3/2004 1:53:16 AM
    - A few thoughts on Analysis and Synthesis - Pete Stanley - 7/3/2004 10:18:50 AM
      - re: A few thoughts on Analysis and Synthesis - Davin L. - 7/6/2004 5:56:32 PM
      - re: A few thoughts on Analysis and Synthesis - S - 7/4/2004 10:55:45 PM
        
        ru-ro rorge! - Pete Stanley - 7/6/2004 7:25:54 AM
        
        Clancey - Larry J - 7/6/2004 7:27:16 PM
        
        I would hestitate to use the term "credulous idiot." - Tom Brosz - 7/6/2004 6:32:37 PM
    - re: Still no bark - Tom Brosz - 7/3/2004 3:59:09 AM
      - re: Still no bark - Pres of Peace - 7/15/2004 6:01:06 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)