When you say, <"The man is completely full of crap."> You are going ad hominem again and being meaningless in addition. Certainly he has his singular measure of fecal material in his system, as you certainly do, and as do we all.

I read the Brendan Nyhan piece and it appeared to me he uses the same sort of insinuation he accuses Moore of. Additionally, Nyhan not only makes no case that Moore was dishonest or lying his accusation boils down to Moore being quilty of "silly and obvious errors."

Had he explored those errors and exposed them he might have gained some audience. As it is, "Citizens for Legitimate Government" here in Florida claims to have accumulated "Mountains of Evidence" of election fraud, some of which I recognized and is verifiable.

It seems to me that Moore has very well accomplished his purposes. He has gotten critical acclaim, is making a scad of money from his film, has upset and scarred the GOP, and has reduced you to the school yard rhetoric of saying<"The man is completely full of crap.">

Then you go on to say, "That some people hold him in such high regard in interesting, and disturbing" Perhaps you could work through being so distrubed with a little therapy?

I was pretty neutral on Moore before, but now I find myself holding him in much higher regard. Interesting?

Publius