Perhaps we should have taken a poll before the invasion to just see how popular deposing Sadam would have been?
Perhaps we wouldn't have had to use some cockamamie story about WMD's?

Perhaps we should hold accountable the head of the CIA and the CIC for their poor job performance? After all, we PAY them to be accurate in matters of international secutiy. (Hey, they just cost us BILLIONS of dollars in tax payer's monies.....and made us unpopular among developed and developing nations).

What's an insurgent anyway? An Iraqi who has lost his countries president, been taken over by another country who stole the monies from their banks, took over their oil wells and installed a puppet government? Would you fight too?

Let try an analogy. Let's say China thinks our ruler is a madman and is a looming disaster to the security of all nations. Suppose they invade, take over our banks, our national treasures, and all of our natural resources? Suppose they install some Chinese American with strong ties to their commercial interests? What if all the Bush supporters took up arms against the invading and occupying forces? What if AMERICANS, proud of their heritage, refused to be governed by the Chinese?
WOULD THEY BE CALLED INSURGENTS??

(Don't forget that the first reason they invaded us was because their national security experts DEEMED we were a threat to international peace).

Heh, heh........just being the devil's advocate here.