re: It doesn't matter if he's a friggin' Whig
I would really think it unlikely that he is a Whig.
All I'm commenting about is Phil's use of this article to attack the left not anything else, really.
I don't think dismissing lame arguments in your way or Phil's is going to make them go away.
Roth's article needs a rebuttal by someone who has some ability to debate without swearing and name calling and can use logic.