But still...

"Though it did not explain in any detail how or why it judged the intelligence to be sound, the report concluded that the assertions by Bush and Blair about Iraq's attempts to acquire "yellow-cake" uranium were "well founded" at the time."

Funny, the media never requested more details when reports said that evidence was "inconsistent" or "contradictory"?

A gem from the first article:

"Thus, although Bush cited only British evidence that was determined to have been inconclusive, other intelligence files clearly contained other inconclusive evidence of the truth of the claim."

I think they were trying to say the evidence is inconclusive...