re: Leading Indicators unimportant? Really?

Current Events » in reply to Leading Indicators unimportant? Really?

Tom Brosz — 7/22/2004 11:46:37 PM (archived)

Half the indicators listed are improving. Did you read the article? I don't know how they weight the importance of each index in the cumulative index, but it hardly adds up to a disaster.

The whole thread (10 posts)

This has to give Rove some gray hair - alcaray - 7/22/2004 4:13:18 PM
- re: This has to give Rove some gray hair - Tom Brosz - 7/22/2004 6:11:01 PM
  - Leading Indicators unimportant? Really? - alcaray - 7/22/2004 11:32:21 PM
    - re: Leading Indicators unimportant? Really? - Tom Brosz - 7/22/2004 11:46:37 PM
      - Back to my original post (in case it was too subtle) - alcaray - 7/23/2004 3:19:27 PM
        
        Subtlety - Tom Brosz - 7/23/2004 7:47:31 PM
      - If only half your heart is working well, - Bowser - 7/23/2004 1:37:16 AM
        
        *sigh* - Tom Brosz - 7/23/2004 2:23:19 AM
        
        Very badly. - Bowser - 7/23/2004 4:53:42 AM
        
        Never actually looked at the link, did you? - Tom Brosz - 7/23/2004 5:10:19 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (10 posts)