re: Hum No...
It isn't to deflect as you would like to portray it but to show in this war on Terror there is someone better qualified for the job of commander and chief.
Why don't you ask about his work history before congress and after Veitnam? Why don't you show how having run failed businesses makes you a better commander and chief (BTW, were each time Daddy pulled Bush's butt out of the fire...). Nothing he has done as commander and chief shows Bush would be better if anything it shows he is incompetent.