Re: Your shields are impervious. I yield.

Space/Science » in reply to Your shields are impervious. I yield.

Re: Your shields are impervious. I yield.

Jody — 12/2/2012 2:33:40 AM (archived)

I KNOW!!!! johannes....you aren't even trying to see a different viewpoint. You are convinced you are right, and on that alone we should follow...heh...there is more to it than that my friend.

Anything debated means shit if you can't even communicate on a basic level.

Dude....

You are frustrating.

The whole thread (38 posts)

Why black holes don't suck. - ER - 11/28/2012 2:01:49 AM
- A 10 y/o plays football against the 49ers. - bowser - 11/30/2012 8:52:58 PM
  - That's relativity. - alcaray - 12/1/2012 4:36:57 AM
- Your argument is valid, except for the fact that - johannes - 11/28/2012 6:27:55 PM
  - Use or misuse of a word tells us nothing about what the word allegedly describes. - ER - 11/29/2012 12:23:20 AM
    - Obsession about definitions? - johannes - 11/29/2012 7:44:27 PM
      - Black Hole is a term coined by astronomers. - ER - 11/29/2012 11:50:29 PM
        
        You wrote that - johannes - 11/30/2012 2:43:57 AM
        
        Newton was 99.99% right. - alcaray - 11/30/2012 3:46:45 AM
        
        :) - TB - 11/30/2012 3:07:48 AM
        
        It is interesting how an honest dialogue often turns towards the absurd. - johannes - 11/30/2012 7:46:46 PM
        
        People saying absurd things will do that. - alcaray - 11/30/2012 8:30:50 PM
        
        Tell me about it. - TB - 11/30/2012 8:20:28 PM
  - The galaxy is expanding? I don't think so. - alcaray - 11/28/2012 7:31:25 PM
    - My reasoning is that - johannes - 11/28/2012 9:21:40 PM
      - Objects that close are both red-shifted and blue-shifted... - alcaray - 11/29/2012 6:43:45 AM
      - But stars and galaxies of stars were formed by gravity? Tthey formed by contraction. I - RobVG - 11/28/2012 11:49:39 PM
        
        Contraction, explosion, expansion. Perhaps. - johannes - 11/29/2012 7:50:56 PM
      - Why not use your reasoning, instead, - ER - 11/28/2012 11:28:26 PM
        
        The concept of an experimental proof is very simple. - johannes - 11/29/2012 7:41:53 PM
        
        No, Johannes. - ER - 11/29/2012 8:10:59 PM
        
        Hmm, interesting - johannes - 11/29/2012 10:00:27 PM
        
        Why make things so complicated? - alcaray - 11/29/2012 11:51:36 PM
        
        The calculations? - johannes - 11/30/2012 2:53:49 AM
        
        The calculations do not need to explain any theory to any layman. - alcaray - 11/30/2012 3:49:47 AM
        
        You are assuming that it is the “mass” that causes the gravitational field. - johannes - 11/30/2012 7:46:02 PM
        
        No I am not. - alcaray - 11/30/2012 8:35:11 PM
        
        OK now that you read about it. - johannes - 12/1/2012 3:39:06 AM
        
        I was hoping you would read about it. - alcaray - 12/1/2012 4:11:50 AM
        
        I read it but did not get the an answer to my question. - johannes - 12/1/2012 4:53:09 AM
        
        Your shields are impervious. I yield. - alcaray - 12/2/2012 12:35:45 AM
        
        Re: Your shields are impervious. I yield. - Jody - 12/2/2012 2:33:40 AM
        
        The shortest possible answer... - TB - 12/1/2012 4:06:24 AM
        
        You have a good question. - johannes - 12/1/2012 4:54:54 AM
        
        Correction - johannes - 11/29/2012 10:01:21 PM
- Well done, 4.0, except they do seem to suck, a lot, and blow, a little. - bowser - 11/28/2012 6:21:11 AM
  - That's true, but... - ER - 11/28/2012 11:49:18 AM
- Excellent, thanks n/t - RobVG - 11/28/2012 4:34:58 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (38 posts)

Related discussions