Space/Science » in reply to re: Radio signals are slower and the BBC is known to be negative.

The whole thread (17 posts)

• Some interesting news from SETI@Home - Tom Brosz - 9/1/2004 10:45:18 PM
  • Probably not an alien signal, and here's why... - LJK - 9/3/2004 11:37:36 AM
  • it seems odd... - LJ - 9/2/2004 4:37:43 PM
    • Alien signal or not... - alcaray - 9/2/2004 6:43:39 PM
  • re: Well... - Raoul - 9/2/2004 3:39:30 PM
    • Isn't Harvard's astronomer expected to be skeptical? What does it stand to gain by NOT being so? - ~tax leech - 9/2/2004 6:46:41 PM
  • Probably nothing. If alien intelligence really existed they'd be here by now (n/t) - Fermi's Paradox - 9/2/2004 2:24:48 PM
    • It is a huge universe, and the speed of light is slow in relation. - REB - 9/2/2004 2:34:24 PM
      • re: Radio signals are slower and the BBC is known to be negative. (n/t) - Marcia - 9/2/2004 4:25:50 PM
        • re: Radio signals are slower and the BBC is known to be negative. - Nigel - 9/3/2004 5:29:05 PM
          • Perhaps she is referring to its government-backed (therefore bureaucratic) status? - ~tax leech - 9/3/2004 5:50:07 PM
            • re: Perhaps she is referring to its government-backed (therefore bureaucratic) status? - nigel - 9/3/2004 7:09:05 PM
  • I wish Sagan was alive to see this. - REB - 9/2/2004 11:59:04 AM
  • Here's the text of the article (New Scientist site has crashed due to traffic) - ~tax leech - 9/2/2004 2:17:49 AM
    • re: Here's the text of the article (New Scientist site has crashed due to traffic) - gbaikie - 9/2/2004 11:42:54 AM
      • That was my thought. - Lee - 9/2/2004 7:33:08 PM
      • CNN.com is covering this matter now (here's the article). - ~tax leech - 9/2/2004 2:39:37 PM