Are you aware that there's nothing in your post but inuendo?

Current Events » in reply to "Texans for Truth"

alcaray — 9/8/2004 11:51:55 PM (archived)

Makes it hard to argue with you. If I assume explicit meaning, then you can deny the intent.

Are you saying that anti-Bush ads must be run only by non-Democrats? Or what on earth?

The whole thread (14 posts)

"Texans for Truth" - Tom Brosz - 9/8/2004 11:33:58 PM
- This Texan say vote for President Bush - REB - 9/9/2004 12:03:36 PM
  - re: When Bush is done being President in 2008 he could run for governor of Texas again and win without even campaigning. - Scott Evil - 9/9/2004 3:19:42 PM
  - ...and about Ann Richards. - REB - 9/9/2004 12:07:52 PM
- And Ben Barnes is a disgraced democratic politician - ebnelson - 9/9/2004 2:13:52 AM
- Are you aware that there's nothing in your post but inuendo? - alcaray - 9/8/2004 11:51:55 PM
  - "Are you saying that anti-Kerry ads must be run only by non-Republicans?" - Tom Brosz - 9/9/2004 2:54:08 AM
    - Are you honestly not trying to have your cake and eat it too (as per usual)? (n/t) - Tony - 9/9/2004 4:55:27 PM
    - No. I I'm not. Any chance of a straight answer from you that does not involve a deflection to an uninvolved party's hypocrasy? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/9/2004 4:02:49 PM
  - re: innuendo - Tom Brosz - 9/9/2004 2:50:52 AM
  - Don't pull a bowser*... - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/9/2004 12:44:57 AM
    - I responded to Tom's post. I'm not responsible for anyone's opinion but my own. - alcaray - 9/9/2004 4:15:10 PM
    - How about "lift a leg" (n/t) - gb - 9/9/2004 7:51:37 AM
    - Heh, heh!!! I like that. - Bowser - 9/9/2004 1:37:07 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (14 posts)