That it still does not explain anything like what CBS is claiming.
The burden is on CBS, and since they don't have the originals, they had no right to claim them as *unimpeachable*.
The burden is entirely on CBS as to how to explain the font, the wording, the lack of military style, secretarial acknowledgement, the non-reg abreviations, the the date discrepancy between the claimed interference by Stoudt and tha fact that he had retired 18 months prior, the fact that alleged writer was not a typist, and the language was not in fact the way he spoke or wrote.
These phony docs fit into an agenda Rather wanted to pursue, and egged on by the DNC they swallowed the koolaid for Kerry.
CBS has refused to do any kind of legitimate explanation of this, but instead have come up with an explanation more appropriate to a ufo promoter making a claim about little green men at Roswell.
Current Events » in reply to re: The selectric composer diversion
Except
