Truth in typing?

E.P. Grondine — 9/15/2004 4:00:58 AM (archived)

http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=881

Certainly the Republican attack on the documents has had some effect - but what will that attacks effect be by election time? Will we know for certain if the documents are real or false by then? And if they turn out to be real, then what happens to those who attacked them?

ep

The whole thread (11 posts)

Truth in typing? - E.P. Grondine - 9/15/2004 4:00:58 AM
- 'What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?' - Larry J - 9/15/2004 2:09:54 PM
- Yo Uncle Eddie, only you and Chrissie think these are 'real' - phil - 9/15/2004 1:50:17 PM
  - Its obvious that the John Kerry Campaign had a hand in producing the forgeries. Kerry's Corruption makes Nixon look lily white. - Scott Evil - 9/15/2004 1:57:16 PM
  - If the source of the fakes comes out... - REB - 9/15/2004 1:55:00 PM
    - I think the fakes were produced by the ex-TANG clerk - ebnelson - 9/15/2004 2:12:07 PM
- Earth to EP: the docs are fake. The question is how large a blast radius will develop against MSM & DNC for doing it? (n/t) - ebnelson - 9/15/2004 1:43:07 PM
- Good Lord, they're fake. Have ANY of you been paying attention to the news? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 9/15/2004 4:38:01 AM
- "And if they turn out to be real"??? That is absurd. They are fakes on the surface. The date format alone is sufficient to prove them fakes. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 9/15/2004 4:18:48 AM
  - re: Even the Washington Post says they are fake. - Scott Evil - 9/15/2004 1:54:19 PM
    - re: Opps, I meant Washington Times... Can the New York Times be far behind? (n/t) - Scott Evil - 9/15/2004 2:10:07 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (11 posts)