Sure. The candidate's daughter's clothing is a real issue here.

Seriously: You think that sending medical supplies to stricken areas where people went without clothing for centuries before the Europeans came should take a back seat to modesty? Mrs. Kerry suggested that relief efforts be coordinated in a way that puts the most important things first. Medical supplies, sanitary facilities, clean water, shelter, food, soap. In a warm climate, clothing is not even near the top of the list. Most of us can find something to wear, even if it's just the same clothes we had on yesterday. Even among clothing needs there are priorities: shoes are more important in flood-stricken areas, because of the danger of puncture wounds to the feet from concealed debris.

It's too bad that this common-sense observation was not couched in politically-correct enough terms for you.

The photo was already explained months ago: evening gown fabric is not always tested for transparency under harsh, bright photographer's lighting. Evening gowns are made for evening, when the light is generally not as bright, because the sun is down.

Score for using a misrepresented statement as an excuse to post an old-news photo of a candidate's daughter with salacious intent: minus five. Items causing negative score: misrepresentation; excuse to connect unrelated story; old news; slamming the candidate's child (attending a non-political event); salacious intent.