"Why is he almost never referred to as an AQ terrorist? "

Current Events » in reply to I seriously doubt he was there without Saddam's blessings and support.

Tony — 9/23/2004 2:54:14 PM (archived)

Perhaps because he claims to be fighting for "Tawhid wal Jihad".
He IS regularly described in the press as an AQ associate.
You and I can only speculate the links between the two.

The whole thread (13 posts)

Note to Zarqawi: watch the skies. - Tom Brosz - 9/22/2004 6:32:23 PM
- re: Paradise just got another virgin raping "holy-man" - Scott Evil - 9/22/2004 8:25:20 PM
- Zarqawi, the Al Qaeda leader in Iraq for going on two years - ebnelson - 9/22/2004 6:52:51 PM
  - DNC and your axis had nothing to do with it - alcaray - 9/22/2004 9:36:27 PM
    - Might be a missed opportunity. - ebnelson - 9/22/2004 10:13:30 PM
      - Saddam's blessings? No. - alcaray - 9/22/2004 10:52:47 PM
        
        Okey-dokey - ebnelson - 9/22/2004 11:35:44 PM
        
        Expand, please. - alcaray - 9/22/2004 11:48:57 PM
        
        I seriously doubt he was there without Saddam's blessings and support. - ebnelson - 9/23/2004 1:18:43 AM
        
        "Why is he almost never referred to as an AQ terrorist? " - Tony - 9/23/2004 2:54:14 PM
        
        So what were we talking about? Oh yeah, the example of Bush's contempt for the war on terror. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/23/2004 3:24:17 PM
    - Great link. Too bad. Who's side is Bush on, anyway? - Bowser - 9/22/2004 9:56:12 PM
  - We have had over a year to find him. It is time that we get serious. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 9/22/2004 7:00:28 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (13 posts)