I'm with you

Off Topic » in reply to Madam, I'm Adam.

I'm with you

tony — 9/30/2004 5:25:37 AM (archived)

How could an asian guy 3500 years ago be a common ancestor for, say Aborigines living today?

"Although some groups of people may have lived in isolation from the rest of the world for hundreds of years, the researchers say no one alive today has been untouched by migration."

well that would explain why we're all so homogeneously coffee colored.
I dont think these researchers get out much........

Alternatively, since its the Telegraph, take their interpretation of the paper with a hefty dose of salt.

The whole thread (8 posts)

Madam, I'm Adam. - Tom Brosz - 9/30/2004 4:24:05 AM
- Missing concepts - LJ - 9/30/2004 4:32:20 PM
  - I figured I was misunderstanding the principles involved. - Tom Brosz - 9/30/2004 9:04:00 PM
    - A bit more (than you really wanted?) - LJ - 9/30/2004 9:49:45 PM
      - Wouldn't "related to" be a bit more accurate than "descended from?" (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 10/1/2004 5:02:30 AM
        
        No - descended from is completely accurate - LJ - 10/1/2004 3:54:35 PM
- So my Pal-in-rome is my recent relative - R.L. - 9/30/2004 8:26:45 AM
- I'm with you - tony - 9/30/2004 5:25:37 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (8 posts)