Current Events » in reply to For The Neo-Cons, the War in Iraq is Already Won

The whole thread (16 posts)

• For The Neo-Cons, the War in Iraq is Already Won - Chris Vancil - 10/12/2004 10:57:52 PM
  • re: What a sore loser. - Scott Evil - 10/13/2004 8:06:36 PM
  • Sounds almost stupid enough to be written by a French 'thinker' - ebnelson - 10/13/2004 12:37:30 AM
    • Oh...it is from a French source. (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/13/2004 3:36:51 PM
  • re: For The Neo-Cons, the War in Iraq is Already Won - gbaikie - 10/13/2004 12:21:34 AM
    • re: Rumsfeld and Hussein 1983 - Chris Vancil - 10/13/2004 11:53:06 AM
      • FDR and Stalin 1945 - Lee - 10/14/2004 8:02:26 AM
        • re: Actually Churchill, FDR and Stalin 1945 - Chris Vancil - 10/14/2004 8:54:30 AM
          • Saddam was our tool. Iran posed a serious threat to the world in the 1980s. - Lee - 10/14/2004 3:27:26 PM
            • re: Saddam was our tool. Iran posed a serious threat to the world in the 1980s. - Chris Vancil - 10/15/2004 12:48:33 AM
              • Stepping on our feet seems pretty insane to me. (n/t) - Lee - 10/15/2004 7:03:36 AM
                • Well Saddam thought he wasn't stepping on our feet because of a conversation he had with Glaspie on July 25, 1990. After he invaded he had face to keep. (n/t) - Chris Vancil - 10/15/2004 8:21:56 AM
      • So what? - ebnelson - 10/13/2004 2:11:04 PM
        • re: Just once try reading the post above mine before acting the fool. - Chris Vancil - 10/13/2004 10:27:49 PM
      • re: Rumsfeld and Hussein 1983 - gbaikie - 10/13/2004 1:09:01 PM
        • re: Rumsfeld and Hussein 1983 - Chris Vancil - 10/13/2004 10:25:37 PM