No, you're not the only one, but with you and me, there's an irritation factor at work that I just can't seem to shake. I'll try to do better.
BTW, there are at least two typos in my posts today that I didn't catch, not including the space omitted between "behavior." and "Read" in the header to my previous post to you. So I also know that I'm not immune.
When you say something dumb and also say it in a dumb way, it compounds the image of dumbth.
A dog humping an inanimate object is responding to the absence of another interested, available dog. You might just as well call teenagers manualsexuals. If it was a female, she was probably in heat, though humping in the sense that we all have seen would be quite a stretch, as a dog's vagina is located under her tail. If she wasn't backing into the stuffed animal, then she had an itch on her belly.
Current Events » in reply to It was a female dog.
Typos
The whole thread (27 posts)
- Theresa's money..."I can take it!"
- re: Theresa's money..."I can take it!"
- Get real - Bush was a doofus
- The man has no class
