Sadam was giving money to know terrorist groups and Sadam himself was a terrorist. He gave save harbor to many terrorists including those escaping from Afganistan.

Good enough reasons to attack him in the WAR ON TERRORISM. In fact, if we didn't attack Sadam in THE WAR ON TERRORISM, wouldn't that be evidence that we weren't really fighting a WAR ON TERRORISM? Do Democrats think that THE WAR ON TERRORISM is just a clever rhetorical phrase?

Some Americans actually believe there is a real WAR ON TERRORISM. As you remind us daily, 1,100 soldiers have died fighting in the WAR ON TERRORISM.

Scott Evil