fair point re spammers

Current Events » in reply to 9 years for sending spam? WTF?

Daniel — 11/5/2004 12:36:18 PM (archived)

I would sooner opt for a hefty fine for annoying spammers. But fraudsters do deserve worse - nasty sharks that they are.

(Maybe my reports to Spamcop will have some effect after all? I'm hoping ..)

The whole thread (10 posts)

This sounds like good news (completely unrelated to the election) - Larry J - 11/4/2004 6:27:21 PM
- 9 years for sending spam? WTF? - Lee - 11/5/2004 12:56:53 AM
  - Not just spam. - Mary Anne - 11/5/2004 2:27:41 PM
    - Sounds good to me. - Lee - 11/6/2004 2:34:17 AM
    - A 9 year sentence is rarely 9 years... - Larry J - 11/5/2004 2:37:35 PM
      - True. The balance of the sentence will likely be played out as probation. - Mary Anne - 11/5/2004 2:47:24 PM
  - fair point re spammers - Daniel - 11/5/2004 12:36:18 PM
  - It was the fraud and phony tracnig info they posted. - ebnelson - 11/5/2004 1:15:18 AM
- I agree. The internet will not stay anarchist forever - ebnelson - 11/4/2004 10:28:53 PM
- The internet is no longer the cyberversion of the "Wild West". - Jacob Samorodin - 11/4/2004 7:44:09 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (10 posts)