That the networks decided not to call Ohio earlier?
That a Democratic campaign official asked them not to?
That you had to wait until morning, when everyone had had some sleep and could add and subtract more accurately, to get your results?
Or that we have a result that won't need any intervention by the Supreme Court?
As can be found in the rest of the article, NBC announced Ohio went for Bush later in the night, before the concession speech. It was a decision made by each network, with an eye on the 2000 fiasco.
The fact is, we don't have final figures, and won't for days. Yet crowing can go on without them. OK, fine. You needed those extra few hours to gloat, did you?
You win, and yet you complain that the announcement didn't preceed the results fast enough. I lose -- and I think we have all lost more than we yet know -- but when I complain, I'm acting like a nut. Oooookay, then...
Flame » in reply to Why it took so long for the networks and CNN to call Ohio
What are you complaining about?
