Hello Davin,

Are you sure you're not suffering under altitude sickness as well? You guys have got to get a grip. Your brother brought up AVT, not me. You guy's have huge chips on your shoulder and want to tussle with every poster that makes a comment.

Atomic Vortex Theory presents a cosmological model. To ask it to determine things like the force of a bowling ball is absurd. Do you expect the big bang cosmological models to calculate the force of bowling balls? I have to assume all those that criticize the theory really haven't actually read it and if they have read it certainly haven't any comprehension of it.

What Atomic Vortex Theory does is explain how an infinite universe can exist. The big bang cosmological models postulate either primordial matter exploding and expanding (and now accelerating) or a cycle of expansions and crunches. The latter means the universe is infinite, even if it keeps recycling it's component energy.

How can such an infinite universe function?
What's the math behind energy that can last forever?

That's what AVT resolves. It postulates that all energy travels in infinite logarithmic spirals from the quantum level on up to the galactic levels and that these motions allow for the eternal flow of energy from one form into another.

It's really amazingly simple and elegant.

It has also accurately predicted the arms of galaxies which were discovered and it accurately predicted that fully shaped galaxies would be found further out than anyone expected to find them (at least most big band models keep projecting finding no fully formed galaxies) It can also explain the reason spiral galaxies sustain their shape. It has many other predictions which make the theory quite falsifiable, and like any good theory it can be built on, modified and used as a tool for understanding how our universe functions.

Having a "pattern recognizing" brain alone won't help describe the function of the universe. One has to realize that all these other shapes we see are really just manifestations of these energy flows into various mathematically formed shapes. The Fibonacci sequences or even the musical scale all provide clues to these eternal specific patterns of energy regeneration, expansion and "life" and degeneration, contraction and "death" of every signal and energy motion.

For those who deny the universe is infinite, the theory is just an annoyance. For those who prefer a "creator" it is also an annoyance. The theory illustrates that energy which is found to be eternal and infinite must also exist constantly at various levels or dimensions and therefore was never "created."

At this point the theory is already partially validated - it predicted observations which no other cosmological model did. As more time passes it needs no defense from me. It's predictions and postulations must stand by themselves. If suddenly new observations contradict parts of the theory then I will address it as necessary. So far that day has not arrived.

If even parts of the theory are borne out as the big bang models lose favor, then a whole new view of the universe will slowly be adopted and one that focuses not so much on the "mythical" presumptions of primordial matter explosions and on the units of energy which make up all matter and which compose the universe.

I find that such a day is well worth working towards. If my efforts attract insults and derision along the way, that's quite all right--I certainly expected no less.

SDAI-Tech1