I'm saying the Democrats have, as their goal, the destruction of the Republican Party to the point that they never gain power again. Call that result whatever you like.
Maybe you've forgotten the hysterical liberal rhetoric on "too much power" and "power sharing" back when the Republicans--barely--had both Congress and the Presidency for a few years. I haven't.
Right now, for Obama, it's all about 2014 and the House, and everything he's done so far this month has been dedicated to stripping the Republicans in the House of their base, their ideological foundations, and their unity. In the Senate, Reid is trying to neutralize the filibuster.
As for "rule of law" and the Constitution, I'm amazed you can bring that up in connection with the current Democratic Party without your head exploding.
Obama's entire strategy has been to route around the legislative process and the division of powers. And the Constitution is viewed by most leftists as an obstacle, not something to be respected. A Republican did not write this.
By the way, I'd cut back on the personal insults if I were you. You're tossing stones and you practically live in the Crystal Palace.
Flame » in reply to I'm the one confused?
I didn't say other parties were illegal.
The whole thread (24 posts)
- How to deal with political opposition...
- the opposition has shown wht they think of reasonableness and compromise
- Playing hardball has already paid dividends
- Re: the opposition has shown wht they think of reasonableness and compromise
- From your subject heading I thought this was about winning state legislator offices and gerrymandering.
- In other words, use Republican tactics against Republicans.
- the opposition has shown wht they think of reasonableness and compromise