Tax leech should be banned because ____??? And he deserves the constant wrath of some in these forums because _____???

I think I've asked a maximum of two questions in the past two years that could be considered misinformed BUT then again:

1) Rutan was recently quoted in Time Magazine as saying that if you don't have folks laugh at your new idea, you haven't got a potential breakthrough.

2) Babe Ruth struck out more than anyone else even as he had more homeruns.

3) As Kennedy said in his lunar mission speech: some ask "why" but I prefer to ask "why not?"

Now then, this is supposed to be a HABITABLE zone. Nevertheless, some folks respond in inhospitable ways that make the zone seem anything but habitable. I nevertheless say that if we had competitive prizes, we could give all these "silly" ideas a better chance of being tested. But that potentially jeopardizes some folks' tax-subsidized sinecures, making me and the majority of Americans who support pro-entrepreneurial tax cuts fair game. Is that your definition of habitable?