How come religious judges ain't OK for Iraq but ARE OK for the US?

Current Events » in reply to Bush renominating judges

Bowser — 12/24/2004 6:21:07 AM (archived)

Seems strange - no theocracy for the Middle East, but hell-bent on establishing one in the US.

Arf (some of those judges seem like right-wing Jesse Jacksons)

The whole thread (9 posts)

Bush renominating judges - Tom Brosz - 12/24/2004 5:29:38 AM
- How come religious judges ain't OK for Iraq but ARE OK for the US? - Bowser - 12/24/2004 6:21:07 AM
  - Please point out the names on the list that qualify as "theocrats." - Tom Brosz - 12/24/2004 6:35:15 PM
  - The Constitution prohibits religious tests for office and judges - Larry J - 12/24/2004 5:15:51 PM
    - And Bush has one, doesn't he? Try ignoring or spinning that. (n/t) - Bowser - 12/25/2004 1:34:43 AM
      - You would disqualify anyone who is religious. That is a religious test. - Larry J - 12/25/2004 1:37:19 PM
        
        I'lll be darned - you did both. He can if he wants and he says he doesn't. - Bowser - 12/25/2004 3:33:54 PM
        
        When a Democratic president approves a pro-life judge, then you can get huffy about "litmus tests." (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 8:39:17 PM
        
        Of course, it might be a while before we can test that... (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 8:39:47 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (9 posts)