Clearly that is not true. Zarqawi does not = George Washington.

And no one suggested it. You have become eb.

Here's the commonality.

It seems that Zarqawi is interested in ridding Iraq of foreign influences.

George Washington was interested in ridding the US of foreign influences.

Got that? It's not hard. Same goals. Wanted foreigners out of their country. Difference is that the British didn't invade the US.

Now.

Their methods were/are different. Their means are different. Zarqawi seems to beleive that there is no means which is unacceptable, and kills innocent people in gruesome ways.

That is not OK.

And no one said that George Washington = Zarqawi.

Frankly, TB, well, my comment belongs on Flame, too.

Arf