Current Events » in reply to That wasn't intimidation, that was a challenge.

The whole thread (16 posts)

• 1,447 - Donald - 2/5/2005 5:31:22 PM
  • You just weren't getting enoug attention posting the casualities, now you have to lie again. Lie on, you and Bowser seem to be so good at it. Hitler, and other tyrants, would be proud of you both. (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/6/2005 7:23:57 AM
    • EB: Why can't you take this crud to Flame, and stop abusing the TOC. - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 2:00:15 PM
      • I will not leave those kind of statments unchallenged. (n/t) - ebnelson - 2/8/2005 7:43:42 PM
        • Well, then you are failing miserably - Davin :. - 2/8/2005 8:16:03 PM
        • Then challenge them. - Tony - 2/8/2005 8:02:08 PM
    • Content, eb. Substance. - Bowser - 2/7/2005 7:39:09 AM
    • 1,448 - Donald - 2/6/2005 6:31:26 PM
  • Not a feelgood, not brought to you by a DoD supported blog. - Bowser - 2/6/2005 5:00:27 AM
    • We seeing conspiracies behind the bushes again? - Tom Brosz - 2/6/2005 7:58:59 PM
      • Just me and the Pentagon, tb. - Bowser - 2/7/2005 3:20:58 AM
        • That wasn't intimidation, that was a challenge. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/7/2005 4:25:52 AM
          • tb - any idea as to why these contracts are not publicized? - Bowser - 2/7/2005 5:50:28 AM
            • Think yourself. How many of thousands of contracts ARE "publicized?" (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 2/7/2005 6:14:50 AM
              • tb, I think you have lost it. - Bowser - 2/7/2005 7:35:59 AM
                • I've lost it? - Tom Brosz - 2/7/2005 4:14:54 PM