You want R.L. to stop tangling with you, why do you persist in baiting him? Not just on flame, but elsewhere? I would say your petty agenda (to solicit a nuclear response so you can play victim in public and go crying to the moderator) makes you a great candidate for the place Tony put up.

I think you interpret the actions of Robert S. to be that he is 'on your side', I can only hope that you will be surprised next time you want to parade your 'RL wuz soo MEAN to me!' cross around when he goes nuclear on you.

I don't agree with how the situation between you two was handled. I found it unilateral, arbitrary and inconsistent with the stated bylaws that this board was founded under and wore like a badge. I said as much, and got silence [Though also note I am not saying RL was not above criticism for his behavior]. If you, on the other hand, are satisfied with how things went, then perhps you might wish to demonstrate that you were worthy of the treatment you got.

Please notice how pathetic it is to watch Ed go back to his old tricks after (as we are told) pledging to turn over a new leaf. How do you think you appear?

I have started not signing my flames as a courtesy to my future self, and as someone who has seen the future of what can be done with web engineering. I'm sure you (and the bevy) know who this is. My prose style is unmistakable. In the past, you have seemed to always insist on calling me by name on your responses to such posts (a double standard)- Part of that maturity thing I suppose. Do as you wish.