The article on the news pieces from the government wasn't my main point.
Bowser took a story on TV news items distributed by the government, which has been a practice for years, and projected it to cover ALL positive news relating to Iraq. This, despite the fact that the news sources listed in the "Good News" links range all over the planet. Go to the "Good News" link and just run your mouse over the different links. Are these newspapers and other sources ALL toadies of the Great Bush Conspiracy?
That you cannot prove that a particular news story did not come from a secret Pentagon source is not the same thing as proving that it did.
Also, the idea that the complete lack of evidence that a story has been "cooked" somehow proves that it was, is inane.
Current Events » in reply to Bowser was right on point
re: Bowser
The whole thread (18 posts)
- More on the source of many of he "Good News" stuff - "Administration Rejects Ruling On PR Videos"
- re: More on the source of many of he "Good News" stuff
- TB, the idea IS that you'll have a hard time identifying the source!!
- Reality implosion
- Bowser was right on point
- The first TB post was irrational, the second ad hominem. Wanna address the topic? (n/t)
- Reality implosion
- TB, the idea IS that you'll have a hard time identifying the source!!
- re: More on the source of many of he "Good News" stuff
