re: And so is the parachute

Space/Science » in reply to Not a very good architecture

Raoul — 3/16/2005 6:36:11 AM (archived)

That's the price to pay for not having something in moon orbit that must work (unmanned while the crew is away on the floor) and which can only orbit over the landing site at limited moments and which multiplies the number of parts that could fail.

Raoul

The whole thread (8 posts)

More on Griffin - Buck Galaxy - 3/15/2005 6:44:15 PM
- re: He was behind FLO!! - Raoul - 3/15/2005 9:03:24 PM
  - Not a very good architecture - E.P. Grondine - 3/15/2005 9:42:49 PM
    - re: And so is the parachute - Raoul - 3/16/2005 6:36:11 AM
      - The Practical Aeronaut - E.P. Grondine - 3/16/2005 5:54:24 PM
        
        re: 2 spacecrafts - Raoul - 3/16/2005 7:41:24 PM
        
        re: 2 spacecrafts - E.P. Grondine - 3/17/2005 7:58:08 PM
- Yep! The guy talks sense. Very refreshing. (n/t) - Jacob Samorodin - 3/15/2005 7:46:55 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (8 posts)