Go back over the past few days and tell me you can honestly say that even < than 10 % of the counterpoint posts are more hostile than the one of mine you criticize. Certainly < 10% of the posts received flame warnings. I find the inconsistant mob mentality routinely demonstrated here rather irritating. Simply pointing out that someone known for a certain amount of arrogance with regard to insider knowledge seemed to have missed a significant story does not constitute a flame in anyway IMO.

There are far too many like RL who point fingers then ignore their own transgressions. RL criticizes me for trying to end on a positive note in seeming contradiction to an earlier post made before I read a post I felt required me making ammends yet goes on flaming multiple times in the same thread and below afterwards. I think it's obvious from Keith's subsequent responses who he found more offensive and that he was not provoked by my final response. Youre so called consensus consists of people who have argued more heatedly multiple times with Keith (CV and DE) and you. Do you honestly expect me to consider these fair criticisms?

Regards,
Mark