Okay.
You know, I could go into this issue if I thought it was that critical. I could point out that like many of the complaints we're hearing from prisoners, much of it is based on the prisoner's word on it. I see no objective observations, like the ones we saw in the documents released by the ACLU.
The original Feb. 2 article is here.
Count the number of times the word "claims" is used.
The only objective part of the story, and that only depends on how MSNBC "learned" things, and who their "sources" are, is that someone was held by mistake in Afghanistan because of a confusion of names.
A bureaucratic screwup.
It's being investigated. Maybe he was mistreated. We'll see.
But if you want to put this on the same level as Abu Ghraib, go for it.