Current Events » in reply to Passive or active voice?

The whole thread (19 posts)

• 1,684 - Donald - 6/9/2005 12:44:20 AM
  • Oh dear, you were doing so well - Sam F. - 6/9/2005 7:27:38 AM
    • I used the term "murdered", below. Do I earn any right-wing kudos? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/9/2005 9:21:54 PM
      • Passive or active voice? (n/t) - Sam F. - 6/10/2005 10:48:25 AM
        • quibbles are easier to earn than kudos (n/t) - alcaray - 6/10/2005 3:01:28 PM
          • Evasive non-answers are the easiest (n/t) - Sam F. - 6/10/2005 4:23:45 PM
            • You referring to yours or mine? (n/t) - alcaray - 6/10/2005 4:34:36 PM
              • Hey, it's OK, a lot of people don't know basic grammar - Sam F. - 6/11/2005 1:13:50 PM
                • If you want to become the grammar police, be careful. - Mary Anne - 6/11/2005 10:08:55 PM
                  • Distinguishing between the active and passive voice in relation to this thread is not a quibble. - Sam F. - 6/12/2005 10:55:10 AM
                    • alcaray doesn't need me to intervene. You do. - Mary Anne - 6/12/2005 6:25:29 PM
                      • And, you've apparently forgotten this, Samwise: - Fox - 6/13/2005 2:48:25 AM
                    • Oh, and to answer your subject line... - alcaray - 6/12/2005 4:31:44 PM
                    • You know, this is the second time I've noticed you... - alcaray - 6/12/2005 4:23:03 PM
    • Splitting hairs - Donald - 6/9/2005 12:14:23 PM
  • Gutless press corps do not ask B&B when our troops will return home - E.P. Grondine - 6/9/2005 5:02:47 AM
    • Yeah, let's set a target date for the enemy. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/9/2005 5:03:30 AM
      • re: Yeah, let's set a target date for the enemy. - Doug Ellison - 6/9/2005 8:47:52 AM
      • More and more enemy everywhere, always. Bush for God-Emperor so the enemy will fear our resolve! (n/t) - et - 6/9/2005 5:22:53 AM