Who else would act as the source for such a ridiculous and unverifiable story?
And given that, would any reporter who takes his craft even the least bit seriously, report such a ridiculuos claim from an annonomous source unless said source was 1st party to the accusation (ie. the source would have to be either the raper or the rapee for a reporter to take the claim seriously). Such a claim could never be proven. By its very nature it is he said she said. Or in this case, they said.
The Clintons are behind it. It's the only explanation that fits.