I really appreciate LJK's attempt to post cutting edge science, I honestly do- and I have followed his(?) links and even printed out the papers in a few cases...

I think the problem is in the presentation...

At my last job I had access to just about every science and engineering journal online... I would set aside one or two hours a week to search all of the hundreds of journals on topics that interested me at the moment... I would scan hundreds of paper titles, maybe 20% were interesting enough to read the abstracts, of those maybe 30% were papers I would actually download and read/scan, of those maybe 10% would be papers I would print out and read in depth. I did not post every one of the papers I found interesting here.

Here is my suggestion to LJK, offered as good natured advice...

LJK, when you find a slew of papers that you find interesting, instead of posting your finds as seperate individual posts, why dont you post your finds as a thread? (In other words reply to yourself... For example Start by posting "Here are a few papers I found that may interest you, this one is on Active Galactic Nuclei" Then respond to that one by posting "And here is one on Antimatter Propulsion" and then respond to that one with "And another on the Pioneer anomaly"... etc)

I for one will read your posts and reply to the ones I also find interesting...

ET also makes a good point about formatting- It really helps in keeping people reading your posts...

It also may help if you post commentary on why YOU find this paper interesting...

These are just suggestions that I hope you take seriously- I think you are a real contributor here, I am just suggesting ways that you could contribute more efficiently...