As I read your posts, I'm gathering that the Canadian train disaster was not the fault of a lack of understanding on the part of the fire department, not negligence on the part of the train company, but

SOMEHOW DUE TO OPPONENTS OF THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE!

I'm going to ask if that's true. Is it? That those people up and down the US who don't want oil running through their backyards are the reason that town blew up? And that the Keystone line would be done now, and that train wouldn't be there? Is that what you're saying? Because it sounds like it.

If that is true, the implication is that pipelines are safe, foolproof, environmentally friendly. Are you throwing that in for good measure? People shouldn't have trains with oil running through the neighborhood occasionally, but should have the continual presence of oil in a pipeline?

I'm just checking. When one hears something which seems silly coming from an otherwise level-headed, sensible, understandable guy one should give the benefit of the doubt.